This is not something that can be stated as fact, or asserted in a way that conveys confidence in the conviction. It is possible to be somewhat disbelieving of something while remaining somewhat suspicious that it is occurring – or is being heavily pushed.
I have mentioned on this blog before that I do not delve much into matter of social justice, as the topic seems to be the realm of traffic boosters, outrage mongers, and activist journalists who either have an axe to grind, or have some deluded yet high-falutin’ impression of themselves as civil rights champions. However the prominence of social justice campaigning, and the constant push for it everywhere – in particular the military – does make me suspicious.
Is social justice a product of Chinese Communist Party propaganda?
Given that the writings of Sun Tzu detail that it is preferable to take a country intact rather than destroying it, I see impacts of social justice steering places like the United States toward a result that China would desire: a weakened US.
As social justice teachings are occurring in the military now, telling soldiers that the country in which they were born and raised is saturated with evil to this day, I can imagine that it would undermine the desire of the soldiers to fight for it. Soldiers fight for country, but if they believe their country is bad, then why should they fight to maintain its strength?
Social justice activists have rioted for causes (and have gained media attention) that are quite divisive to the people generally. I would contend that racial divides are growing within the US, with each side demonising each other, and school board meetings being sites of tension with the social progressives performing the bullying role – and a sympathetic media skewing items to be optically better for the social activists, mostly because their politics align.
So far I have offered nothing to connect the activism back to the CCP. I am writing solely on suspicion, and a lot of it conjecture because when I see the results of social justice activism, I see it aligning with the CCP’s interests; a weaker US more concerned with internal fighting than being wary of another country’s territorial ambitions.
A weaker US military focussing more on inclusion and representation rather than lethality is only a benefit to a country with regional aspirations.
A people who don’t believe in their country are less willing to fight for it.
Heck, look at the supposed Communist Party’s 45 Goals (as read into Congress in 1963) and see how the social justice modus operandi, beliefs and aims align. Racial divide. Eliminating all historic structures (ie statues). Using the courts to weaken the Constitution. Sure, the timing would suggest that the focus would be on the USSR rather than the CCP, but if the goal is to further Communism by weakening the US, then it would seem to make sense that Communists – regardless of nation – would adopt the ideas.
While the US wrestles with inclusion, diversity and taking care of peoples’ feelings, the CCP bans effeminate males and same-sex couples in media, and has the kind of diversity than can only really be summarised by the photo below.
Again, this is all suspicion on my part. I am not saying that social justice activists are the Useful Idiots of the CCP. I am not saying with any degree of certainty that true imbeciles in the media are being manipulated by grand propaganda from a state that is laughing at how easily their arms are tweaked by strings.
But I am really suspicious.
Rich People Laughing 